Demand letter to Lieutenant Governor of BC

Shuswap resident demand letter (part of it} to reconnect power to Janet Austin, current Lieutenant Governor of BC.

As you are probably aware, CANADA and PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA are both corporations registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (USSEC) under the numbers 0000230098 and 0000836136 respectively, and are legal entities, with the purpose of operating for profit. These two “government” entities are actually, by definition, the system used for controlling people (see “government” in the Cambridge dictionary).

https://freeshuswap.com/canada-as-a-corporate-state/

With the repealing of the enacting clause of the British North America Act, 1867 (currently unlawfully referred to as the Constitution Act, 1867) in 1893 via the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, all government/controlling bodies in so called Canada have been acting fraudulently since June 9, 1893 and Fraus omnia corrumpit: fraud negates everything, including prior consent. The so called de facto (vs de jure) government that you are employed by is merely a service corporation, and the so called enactments passed in the so called legislature are merely rules passed in a board room in a very nice “Golden Age” style building in Victoria by members of a board of directors of the corporation under USSSEC central index key number 0000836136. BC Hydro and the PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, both for profit corporations, are complicit in unlawfully cutting power to our property in 2019, under the authority of fraudulent documents and communications.

As a result, all “enactments”, corporate policies and by-laws passed by today’s de-facto parliament of Canada and the legislatures of all so called provinces since the dismantling of the BNA Act, 1867 are repugnant to the common law and fraudulent when applied to the men and women sojourning on the land commonly referred to as Canada, including, but not limited to, all enactments governing yourself and British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority: Hydro and Power Authority Act, Utilities Commission Act, Financial Administration Act and the Financial Information Act. Any edict referring to the requirement of BC Hydro customer to accept any radiation emitting/wireless device on his/her property is not enforceable, due to the fraudulent nature of the corporations’ various “rules and regulations”. Section 361(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada confirms “false pretence” is a criminal act: “A false pretence is a representation of a matter of fact either present or past, made by words or otherwise, that is known by the person who makes it to be false and that is made with a fraudulent intent to induce the person to whom it is made to act on it.” Section 380 (2) of the Criminal Code of Canada states: (2) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud, affects […] anything that is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

In addition to the repealing of the British North America Act, 1867, even if one incorrectly still holds a belief that the BNA Act, 1867 was not fully repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, Section 2 of the BNA Act, 1867 enactment was specifically repealed in its entirety by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, which stated:

Statute Law Revision Act, 1893

56-57 Victoria, c. 14 (U.K.)

[Note: Only parts affecting the Constitution Acts are reproduced here.]

An Act for further promoting the Revision of the Statute Law by repealing Enactments which have ceased to be in force or have become unnecessary

[9th June 1893]

Whereas it is expedient that certain enactments, which may be regarded as spent, or have ceased to be in force otherwise than by express specific repeal by Parliament, or have, by lapse of time or otherwise become unnecessary, should be expressly and specifically repealed:

Be it therefore enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

Enactments in schedule repealed. 1. The enactments described in the schedule to this Act are hereby repealed, subject to the provisions of this Act and subject to the exceptions and qualifications in the schedule mentioned; and every part of a title, preamble, or recital specified after the words “in part, namely,” in connexion with an Act mentioned in the said schedule may be omitted from any revised edition of the statutes published by authority after the passing of this Act, and there may be added in the said edition such brief statement of the Acts, officers, persons, and things mentioned in the title, preamble, or recital, as may in consequence of such omission appear necessary:

……….

Short title. 4. This Act may be cited as the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893.

SCHEDULE

———————————————————————————

Reign and               |                       Title

Chapter                 |

———————————————————————————

………………………………..

British North America Act, 1867.

30 & 31 Victoria                In part; namely,

1. 3 From “Be it therefore” to “same as follows.”

Section two.

Section four to “provisions” where it last occurs.

Section twenty-five.

Sections forty-two and forty-three.

Section fifty-one from “of the census” to “seventy-one and” and the word “subsequent .”

Section eighty-one.

Section eighty-eight, from “and the House” to the end of the section.

Sections eighty-nine and one hundred and twenty-seven.

Section one hundred and forty-five.

Repealed as to all Her Majesty’s Dominions.

Section 2 of the BNA Act, 1867 stated: The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. For clarity, the related definitions are as follows: REPEAL. The abrogation or annulling of a previously existing law by the enactment of a subsequent statute which declares that the former law shall be revoked and abrogated. ABROGATION. The destruction or annulling of a former law, by an act of the legislative power, by constitutional authority, or by usage ANNUL. To reduce to nothing; annihilate; obliterate; to make void or of no effect; to nullify; to abolish; to do away with. (Black’s Law 4^th Edition)

To paraphrase the result of the abrogation/annulment/annihilation/ obliteration of Section 2 of the BNA Act, 1867, The Provisions of the BNA Act, 1867 no longer extend to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. In other words, Queen Victoria’s heirs and successors have no authority in this realm, therefore all Lieutenant Governors and the Governor General are placed fraudulently in their positions, and as a result, are acting fraudulently with regard to any activities relating to the aforementioned corporations posing as governments.

MC