Multiculturalism
Diversity is division! Unity is strength. The term Multiculturalism is an oxymoron. A culture is something that grows over many centuries as a set of rigorously enforced local rules and customs to enable people in that region to interact in a harmonious manner for the purposes of sustaining life in that region. It is not possible to have different cultures in one region for very long as different attitudes, breeding technologies, and so forth will eliminate all but the cultures with aggressive practices.
Society is comprised of individuals operating together for what was common in human needs, both physical, emotional, and spiritual. We do not act as individuals for to do so is to go back to prehistory and create a ‘dog eat dog’ society where no one looks farther than ‘what is in it for them’. I society of selfish individuals. I will describe them as ‘heartless’. It is an interesting exercise to accommodating many views, without elevating one set of values and beliefs as the core value system as the social fabric. To papering over differences with ‘hate laws’ is but a temporary illusion. It is not working. Europe’s experiment with multiculturalism is well advanced and it is discovering its folly.
Culture is a concept that once had certain element of ‘quality’ to it. Some may consider its antithesis to be barbarism. Glavis on Urban Dictionary describes it as a person: “To have refinement in taste and manners. To be refined, well-educated or worldly. This may apply to manners, dress, language , lifestyle or architecture. Learned in the way of civilized society.” It derives from the Latin cultus. Its roots are similar to those of cultivate: to till and prepare for growth. Similar to education, culture could be considered to have levels from low to high and the high culture was considered different and better than low culture, which in turn was better than uncultured. And so culture represented excellence.
However, Multiculturalism is typically defined as: “the presence of, or support for the presence of, several distinct cultural or ethnic groups within a society.” This does not match the previous definition of culture and has more to do with race mixing and colour mixing in a society. The sales pitch for ‘Multiculturalism’ is not just accept the small mix of peoples as they existed, it used a sales pitch to push a forced brand of ‘multiculturalism’. Thus, if there weren’t enough alternative cultures to demonstrate multiculturalism, they were imported so that the dominant culture was no longer dominant or exclusive. Thus it was ‘forced’ multiculturalism. Collins describes: ” Multiculturalism is a situation in which all the different cultural or racial groups in a society have equal rights and opportunities, and none is ignored or regarded as unimportant.” The original culture comes in danger of being sidelined.
“What multiculturalism boils down to is that you can praise any culture in the world except Western culture – and you cannot blame any culture in the world except Western culture.” -Thomas Sowell
Multiculturalism is a marxist ideology designed to ethnically cleanse European derived peoples by promoting the massive 3rd world invasion of Europe, United States, Canada, and Australia. Multiculturalism leads to racial tension and may erupt into a racial conflict once the racial spoils system breaks down.
The next definition demonstrates special interest groups special favour out of proportion to population:
That acknowledgement can take the forms of recognition of contributions to the cultural life of the political community as a whole, a demand for special protection under the law for certain cultural groups, or autonomous rights of governance for certain cultures. Multiculturalism is both a response to the fact of cultural pluralism in modern democracies and a way of compensating cultural groups for past exclusion, discrimination, and oppression.
And this is where we get on edgy ground. If a group can claim ‘victim status’, they win. The individual is reverse categorized based on race, religion, class, and sex, where different is put above normal. A more radical approach by some theorists is that some racial, religious, and sexual groups need more than simple recognition to maintain of a distinct identity. Rather than existing under a system of individual rights, some gain special group rights. But the very concept of rights is to be questioned. Living in a community involves responsibilities before rights. We cannot harmonize in a community if individuals do no more than demand rights including the right to refuse work and demand welfare. We now finish up with protected minority cultures that never existed in the previous harmonious dominant culture created over millennia.
And thus, Frankfurt School was borne.
The Frankfurt School, referred to above , known more appropriately as Critical Theory, is a philosophical and sociological movement originally located at the Institute for Social Research at the Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany. The Institute was founded in 1923 thanks to a donation by Felix Weil with the aim of developing Marxist studies in Germany.
In 1933, Hitler forced closed its Communist subversive activities, and the Institute was moved to the United States where it found hospitality at Columbia University in New York City where is could continue to subvert its new host nation.
The Frankfurt School’s central conclusion was that it was impossible in the post-World-War era to rely only on Karl Marx’s economic analysis to explain the eternal class war. And so communism could not be imposed on the people by the Bolshevik method. They noted the advent of popular culture carried forward by mass media, including television, radio, music, and film for the rise of a new more complex and sophisticated form of class war. They set about imposing communism through media and culture in what is sometimes called “Cultural-Marxism”. These personages are the ultimate traitors to our Western culture as they are the originators and architects of the greatest misery mankind has yet known – Communism.
The term ‘Cultural Marxism’ refers to a theory that sees most of the anti-traditional cultural movements today as being rooted in a systematic Marxist plan to undermine Western society and to bring in a Marxist control of society. Various brands of logic are applied by one ethno-religious group to alter current culture and value system of another ethno-religious group so that the target ethno-religious group has its culture and value system replaced with a new one that reflects the interests of the attacking ethno-religious group that wishes to oppress the target ethno-religious group under the harshest of systems called communism.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn complains that sixty-six million Christians were killed by the Bolsheviks, so to go anywhere near communism is dangerous. But they killed Russians, and so Russians are regenerating and new Russians are born. Immigration changes the equation completely.
In multi-colour and multi-religion regions, a grouping is likely to concentrate on its own interests. Thus, Hispanic people will favour Hispanic politicians and Hispanic businesses and so forth. A politician is not voted for based on his ability and policies but on his colour or religion.
We can already see the real issues associated with growing numbers of people from different cultures in Ontario and the Lower Mainland of British Columbia.
As Jordan Peterson said:” “If you think you can import multitude of cultures without a unifying rubric and not import the problem of interpersonal and social conflict, you’re either blind or stupid or both. And both is a dreadful combination. So, like what? On what basis does multiculturalism become peace? You wave some magic wand and all of a sudden everybody gives up their cultural differences and can live in harmony.”
And the division increases.
NN, DB
