Military power

Empire building and international commerce has been backed by military power, and by the control of the sea as a priority. British colonialism was advanced under the Admiralty’s military ensign, signaling the jurisdiction of the Crown on the High Seas. The Admiralty Jurisdiction applied to commercial contracts on the High Seas where the Crown was a party, while Maritime Jurisdiction applied to contracts on the High Seas not involving the Crown. But over the centuries, the distinction has faded, and Admiralty Jurisdiction has moved onto the land via navigable rivers and lakes, eventually dominating the King’s Equity and Common Law jurisdictions.

Thus, the Crown’s Admiralty Jurisdiction has been gradually applied to the entire “sea of commerce”, comprising all ships, colonies, and commerce within the British Empire/Crown, and by contract Admiralty Jurisdiction has also been applied to all those consenting to trade with the British Empire/Crown anywhere in the world.

In matters of empire, money, and war, it was essential for the Crown to control the High Seas by any means. Queen Elizabeth, in 1577, chose Sir Francis Drake to lead an expedition around South America. Drake acted as a privateer, with official approval to benefit himself and the queen as well as to cause the maximum damage to the Spaniards. The Golden Hind, Drake’s flagship, was later depicted on British coins. As money became synonymous with Admiralty Jurisdiction, coins, postage stamps, and war posters were emblazoned with ships and empire building emblems and slogans, eventually including ‘Britannia Rules The Waves’. Britannia, a goddess of war armed with a trident and shield, became an emblem of British imperial power. Britannia first appeared on English coins on a farthing in 1672.

The European bankers, operating behind the scenes, reaped enormous profits from international commerce under the protection of the Crown’s Admiralty Jurisdiction. With remarkably ingenuity, they devised ways to establish their “system” around the world, causing others to be bound by its codes. To maximise profits, they set up numerous companies using fictitious names that were registered into the system as corporate entities. Notably, under Admiralty Jurisdiction, any existing appellation or name can also be brought into the system by registering a fictional proxy – and by this deception entire nations were “incorporated”.

By subterfuge and war, backed by the Crown, the elites spread their Admiralty Jurisdiction across the land of one nation after another, installing in each a Central Bank to impose bankruptcy by compound interest, and a Bar Association (British Crown Commercial Company) to infiltrate the legislature and the courts.

In the united States of America, the Admiralty Jurisdiction was extended over the land when the Coast Guard surveyed the entire continental united States in 1938, legally “submerging” the land. That same year, the Erie Railroad Co. vs Tompkins decision in the Supreme Court overturned the Common Law Jurisdiction in federal courts. While in Australia, the continent legally came under Admiralty Jurisdiction with the Seas and Submerged Lands Act in 1973.

As the “system” became globalised during the 1800’s, dependable communication was increasingly required to facilitate centralised governance for the extraction of the “common wealth”. The Universal Postal Union was established in 1874 with its headquarters in Berne, Switzerland. The UPU is essentially a global postal system for commerce in the Admiralty Jurisdiction, with its own governing “Acts” and service protocols. At the conclusion of WW2, the UPU became a member of the United Nations “family”.

The Admiralty Jurisdiction combined with the UPU, codified in Statutes and international treaties, can be described as the current global “legal system” of commerce, with its highest form of delivery as the UPU.

Importantly, the “legal system” is specifically for artificial entities in what is a fictional in personam system of commerce. In short, it is not for living people, but fictional “persons”.

Today, the connection between commerce and the sea is reflected in words that relate to all commerce, such as transport, shipping, and citizenship. While references to military command are found in supposedly non-military Western governments, which have various “Generals”.

Every nation that is a member of the UPU has a Postmaster-General commanding its delivery protocols. Other military command positions within the Admiralty Jurisdiction include; Governor-General, Attorney-General, Solicitor-General, Surgeon-General, Auditor-General, Surveyor-General, Secretary-General, Director-General, and Commander-In-Chief. Although these titles may seem antiquated or ceremonial, they are reserved for the key positions of State within Western governance structures.

The entire “legal system” is an artificial construct for the purpose of facilitating commerce and the control of commerce. To make use of this system, it is necessary to register a legal fiction entity, such as a company, corporation, or trust, as a member. This corporate entity is often legally described as an “artificial person”, or simply a “person”.

If a man or woman contracts into the fictional world of commerce without declaring their factual “standing”, they are “acting” as an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person”, existing only in the imaginary system of Admiralty Jurisdiction. When “joinder” occurs by deception, it is a crime of “personage”, and when a false claim is brought into a court it is a crime of “barratry” – a crime appropriately named after the Bar Association.

The State can create and issue a new “person” by “registration”, which is a process of “legalisation”. The usual “legalisation” processes are “registration”, “certification”, “licensing”, “securitisation”, and “general deposit.” By these processes, the State creates commercial property over which it obtains a controlling “security interest”, afterward administering its contracts, and its “persons”, with various codes, rules, regulations, and acts prescribed by legislators in Statutes. The overarching codification of legal fiction commerce is the Universal Commercial Code (U.C.C.), governing all international trade between fictional corporate bodies.

Public servants commit the crime of “personage” by registering a fictional proxy of a baby’s appellation, without disclosure. The fictional NAME is a “vessel” on the “sea of commerce” under Admiralty Jurisdiction. If the vessel’s Master (MR/MRS/MISS) fails to claim their “vessel” and is still missing after seven years, they are “lost at sea”. The “vessel” is salvaged and the property (real/body/soul) is placed in a foreign estate trust, with the State as the “beneficiary”. Consequently, a man or woman ignorant of their “standing” as a living “beneficiary” will forfeit their property into a deceased estate simply by “acting” in “joinder” to the NAME of the “vessel”, which is also a “person”.

Every “person” is a “member of the public” simply because anything “of” the government is “public”. Whereas, any man or woman who retains their sovereign standing in the Common Law is “private”. The logical order of jurisdiction is: Nature > Man/Woman > Government > Person.

The presumption of “joinder” to a “person” can be rebutted by a living man or woman on paper by making an “autograph”, instead of a “signature” which is only made by a “corporate officer” acting in a legal fiction role. An “autograph” is in proper grammatical Common Law format, punctuated as a fact: John-Henry: Doe, and includes an expressed unambiguous declaration, such as “all rights reserved”, “without prejudice”, or “non-negotiable autograph.” Traditionally, it is made in red ink, indicating the “Law of the Land”, as opposed to the blue ink of the “Law of the Sea”. It can include a red ink thumbprint, and a family seal. A living man or woman may also expressly declare themselves to be the “authorised representative”, or the “authorised agent” “for” the “person”, thereby rebutting the presumption of “joinder”.

The Admiralty Jurisdiction, or the “Law of the Sea”, refers to all matters concerning “legal fictions”, while the Common Law Jurisdiction, or the “Law of the Land”, refers to all matters concerning “lawful facts”.

Since military communication is codified, and corporate entities are fictions, the Admiralty Jurisdiction is a codified system of “legal fiction” requiring interpretation using an obscure language, sometimes called “Legalese”. The codifications are universally prescribed in the Universal Commercial Code (U.C.C.), and are supplemented nationally by Statutes. Legal codes are numerous and complex, and are often altered or replaced, while the definitions of words in legal dictionaries are deceptive and changeable. Codes, by definition, preserve secrecy and require deciphering.

Within the “legal system”, commercial disputes can be resolved using a “dispute resolution service” for parties consenting to “act” in “joinder” to legal fiction “persons” of one kind or another in the Admiralty Jurisdiction. This “service” comprises “administrative courts” and various “tribunals”, none of which are convened with a properly constituted jury as in the Common Law Jurisdiction. Just like a military “hearing”, an “administrative court” does not have jury.

The “administrative courts” reflect their maritime roots in their layout and fittings. By tradition, the courtroom is divided into two parts by a barrier known as the “bar”, resembling a ships railing. When someone crosses the “bar” they enter the Admiralty Jurisdiction of the court, often signaled by a flag. In the corporate “United States”, this jurisdiction is signaled by a gold-fringed flag, which is a military ensign, whereas the flag of the constitutional “united States of America” is not gold-fringed. In an “administrative court” one or more judges presides from a bench – Latin for “bank”, and the accused “vessel” is placed in a “dock”.

Because these courts are commercial hearings, the objective is to “settle the account” and extract fees, which is only possible when someone is willing to “act” in “joinder” to a “person”, at which point the “legal fiction” will “appear” in the court. A factual man or woman is not visible in this fictional jurisdiction, where there are “no fixed rules of law or evidence”. “Persons” provide “surety” in the debt-money system, which explains why they are systematically created, and why indebted States need them to “appear” in the “administrative courts”.

In order for a fictional “person” to “appear” in an “administrative court” it is necessary to “summon” a “person” as if from the ether using the magic of “legalese”.

This combination of military, merchant, and postal systems, can simply be described as today’s “legal system” of commerce, with its highest from of delivery as the UPU.

In essence, the “legal system” extracts the “commercial energy” of living people via the “debt-money system”, using “administrative courts” to settle accounts between fictional parties.

Without exception, the “legal system” is an artificial construct, with membership requiring a process of “fictionalisation”, or “incorporation”.

Since “the system”, withal, is built largely on military protocols, it is no surprise that as a system of racketeering and control, it operates with military efficiency.

Nevertheless, as is sadly evident in world events, the physical war system of the military industrial complex is still the most immediate and persuasive control strategy.