BC Supreme Court justified vaccine mandate
The B.C. Supreme Court upholds British Columbia’s Covid-19 health care vaccine mandate and justified this decision. According to judge, the virus still posed the significant risk when the province’s mandate was renewed in October 2023.
Provincial Health Officer Bonnie Henry had first forced the vaccine mandates on all workers in British Columbia in October 2021. The order was renewed in 2022, 2023, and remain in place until today, as the last Covid 19 forcible order in Canada, perhaps in the world.
Due to this unprecedented rule, over 1,800 people lost their jobs and many of them, highly skilled moral professionals left the province. Mostly to Alberta.
In these proceedings, the petitioners challenge the PHO’s two orders of October 5, 2023 (“Orders”), which continued the vaccination requirement for the healthcare workforce in British Columbia which had been in place since October 2021.
The petitioners challenge the reasonableness of the Orders on four main grounds:
- by October 2023, COVID-19 was no longer “an immediate and significant risk” to public health in British Columbia, and therefore the statutory preconditions for the continued use of the PHO’s emergency powers no longer applied.
- the scientific record no longer indicated that unvaccinated healthcare workers posed any greater risk to vulnerable patients, or the healthcare system generally, than vaccinated workers.
- those petitioners who worked remotely or held purely administrative positions argue that their inclusion in the orders was unreasonable, given their lack of contact with vulnerable patients or the frontline healthcare workers who care for them.
- some petitioners challenge the Orders on constitutional grounds under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. They argue that, by forcing them to choose between adherence to their fundamental religious and personal beliefs about vaccination, or keeping their jobs in their chosen professions, the Orders infringed their s. 2(a) right to freedom of conscience and religion, and their s. 7 right to liberty and security of the person.
Judge Simone Coval dismissed all and in conclusion stated that: “ The petitions are dismissed, with the exception that, under JRPA s. 5(1), I remit to the PHO for reconsideration, in light of this decision, whether to consider requests under s. 43 of the PHA, for reconsideration of the vaccination requirement from healthcare workers able to perform their roles remotely, or in-person but without contact with patients, residents, clients or the frontline workers who care for them.”
https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2024/2024bcsc794/2024bcsc794.html#_Toc166155227
February 15 2023, Health Florida as a first institution created Health Alert on mRNA Covid 19 vaccine. The argued, that in Florida alone, there was a 1,700% increase in VAERS reports after the release of the COVID-19 vaccine
The reporting of life-threatening conditions increased over 4,400%. This is a novel increase and was not seen during the 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaign. There is a need for additional unbiased research to better understand the COVID-19 vaccines’ short- and long-term effects.
https://freeshuswap.com/health-alert-on-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-safety/
Since Covid 19 vaccine roll out, there are thousands of lawsuits against Covid- crime worldwide, millions of deaths, injuries, and personal tragedies back up with tonnes of evidence. And long-term effect is still unknown.
The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in Canada provides financial compensation to individuals who have suffered a serious and permanent injury as a result of a vaccine authorized by Health Canada. As of 2024, the program has paid out over $9.4 billion in compensation to over 56,000 claimants since its inception in 1988. Since Covid 19 vaccine roll out those number are significantly growing.
But officials of this province, live in the different world. Wonder what their motivation is behind.
DB
