BC Law

There is not a document that supersedes the God given dominion/supreme authority of all men and women over the Land, Air, Water and all creations of God present in earth, as laid out in Psalms 8: 5-8 : For thou hast made him a little lower then the Angels; and hast crowned him with glory and honour.  Thou madest him to haue dominion ouer the workes of thy hands; thou hast put all things vnder his feete.  All sheepe and oxen, yea and the beasts of the field. The foule of the aire, and the fish of the sea, and whatsoeuer passeth through the paths of the seas.   All men and women have been given the supreme authority to act contrary to any and all laws that are repugnant to God’s laws, especially fraudulent, man-made laws.

CANADA confirms God’s supreme jurisdiction: in the purported “Constitution Act, 1982”, which claims “that Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.”

CANADA confirms God’s supreme jurisdiction: in the preamble to the Canadian Bill of Rights of 1960 states “The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God.”

CANADA confirms God’s supreme jurisdiction: in the national anthem of Canada, which includes “God keep our land glorious and free!”

CANADA confirms God’s supreme jurisdiction: in its motto A mari usque ad mare, which originates from Psalm 72:8: He shall haue dominion also from sea to sea, and from the riuer, vnto the ends of the earth.

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA confirms God’s relevance: in the Supreme Court Rules, BC Reg 221/90, Appendix A, to wit:

ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories, Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA confirms God’s relevance: “so help me God” is included in the oaths of various enactments.

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA confirms God’s relevance: by the inclusion of “act of God” in various enactments.

No document of CANADA or PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA contains any de jure law that overrules the dominion of all men and women in the realm known as Earth, as laid out in the 1611 King James Bible.

Numbers 30:1-2 And Moses spake vnto the heads of the tribes, concerning the children of Israel, saying, This is the thing which the LORD hath commanded.  If a man vowe a vow unto the LORD, or sweare an oathe to bind his soule with a bond: he shall not breake his word, hee shall doe according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth.

Leuiticus 5:3-5 Or if he touch the vncleannesse of man, whatsoeuer vncleannesse it be that a man shalbe defiled withall, and it be hid from him; when he knoweth of it, then he shalbe guilty. Or if a soul sweare, pronouncing with his lips to do euill, or to do good, whatsoeuer it be that a man shall pronounce with an oath, and it be hid from him; when he knoweth of it, then he shalbe guilty in one of these. And it shalbe, when he shalbe guiltie in one of these things, that he shall confesse that hee hath sinned in that thing.

 Queen Victoria did repeal the enacting clause, and section 2, of the British North America Act, 1867 (currently unlawfully called Constitution Act, 1867), by way of the 1893 Statue Law Revision Act, which was “An Act for further promoting the Revision of the Statute Law”, by repealing Enactments [including, but not limited to, the British North America Act, 1867] which have ceased to be in force or have become unnecessary. By doing so, Queen Victoria removed any real or perceived authority to any and all statements of the British North America Act, 1867, including, but not limited to: any and all provisions for any of her successors or heirs, including but not limited to Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor and Charles Philip Arthur George Windsor, regarding the said document; changing the name of said document; and/or allowing the name of the said document to be changed in order to portray it as a valid document.

1 Thessalonians 4:6 That no man goe beyond and defraud his brother in any matter, because that the Lord is the auenger of all such; as we also haue forewarned you, and testified.

There is not a document from 1867 called “The Constitution Act”, and therefore “The Constitution Act, 1867” is a fraud and an unlawful attempt to rename and resurrect the British North America Act, 1867 contrary to the deliberate actions of Queen Victoria via the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893.

26. As a result of the repealing of Section 2 of the British North America Act, 1867 (BNA Act, 1867) by Queen Victoria via the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, there is no publicly acknowledged specific document authorizing the members of the monarchy of the United Kingdom to be involved in the affairs of, or to have any office or status in, the realms known as Canada and British Columbia since January 22, 1901, the date of death of Queen Victoria. The repealed Section 2 of the BNA Act, 1867 stated: “The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland”, and provides further evidence of the fraudulent nature of the documents the de facto governments publicly rely upon.

The Constitution Act [RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 66 is subject to the fraudulent Constituton Act, 1867 (and therefore also has no force of law), as per Section 2 on the document’s first page, to wit:

Act subject to Constitution Act, 1867 2 Despite anything in this Act to the contrary, this Act must be construed as subject to the Constitution   Act, 1867 and amending Acts applicable to British Columbia, and to the order of Her late Majesty Queen  Victoria in Council for the union of British Columbia with the Dominion of Canada under the authority of  that Act.

There is no document conferring authority of any entity, other than God, in CANADA/the land commonly known as Canada, as per the contract/1611 King James Bible, which the UK monarchy pledges to uphold; all such assertions of higher authority over men and women are mere pretences which require meaningful, informed consent, and not consent based on fraud.

There cannot be a de jure Parliament in Ottawa, and there cannot be a de jure Legislature in Victoria, nor in any other province or territory, without the British North America Act,1867, due to it being the document that claims to form the said institutions, and both the Parliament of CANADA and the Legislature of PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA are de facto in essence and in fact.

Private, for-profit corporations including, but not limited to, CANADA, PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, the COURTS of PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA and CANADA, and all related entities are relying on fraudulent and/or concealed documents, and all pieces of paper purportedly claiming authority over the men and women who make their home on the land commonly known as Canada and British Columbia are fraudulent.

The 1670 document known as the “Hudson Bay Charter”, aka the “Governor and Company of Adventurers of England Trading into Hudson’s Bay” has no authority in/on the landmass known as the mainland of British Columbia as the authority of this document only applied to lands in the Hudson Bay watershed.  Unlike Vancouver Island, which was granted to the Hudson Bay Company in 1849, there never was a Royal Charter granting the mainland of what we commonly know as British Columbia to the Hudson Bay Company.

BC’s Interpretation Act alludes to a document that was enacted prior to British Columbia joining Canada in 1871, and that still has the force of law: “The BRITISH COLUMBIA Government Act, 1870” was modified by the 1893 Statute Law Revision (No. 2) Act, two months after the first Statute Law Revision Act of 1893 repealed the  British North America Act, 1867.  The August 1893 alteration is under the title: “An Act to make further provision for the Government of BRITISH COLUMBIA” and it repeals the “Preamble to Columbia: And.“, and section 3, from “may by” to “council and“, such that section 3 now reads: “Her Majesty may from time to time make, and when made revoke or alter, Orders in Council for constituting a Legislature …”.  There is no publicly acknowledged record that “The BRITISH COLUMBIA Government Act, 1870” gives authority to any union between CANADA and BRITISH COLUMBIA, nor any authority to the document titled “OFFENCE ACT,” nor any other document related to powers of any so-called government, regional district, municipality, city, etc.

The BRITISH COLUMBIA Law and Equity Act statement that “…Civil and Criminal Laws of England, as they existed on November 19, 1858, so far as they are not from local circumstances inapplicable, are in force in BRITISH COLUMBIA, but those laws must be held to be modified and altered by all legislation that has the force of law in BRITISH COLUMBIA or in any former Colony comprised within its geographical limits” brings into question what laws are in fact being adhered to/have the force of law.

All statements used to define CANADA in enactments (from the corporation of CANADA’s website) claim that CANADA consists of: waters, inland waters (for example, canals, lakes, rivers, water courses, inlets, bays), the land below the waters, the air above the waters, beaches, and from the point of low tide (the baseline) to twelve nautical miles from shore. Absent from these definitions is any reference to the vast expanse of dry land referred to on maps on CANADA’s website, confirming that all living men and women inhabiting the landmass known as Canada are outside of the jurisdiction of CANADA, and CANADA’s population is composed of merchant accounts only, for which men and women act as agents and trustees, without informed consent in most cases.

The de facto governments are perpetrating fraud on the men and women who inhabit this land.  The American Heritage Dictionary defines “fraud” as:  A deception practiced in order to induce another to give up possession of property or surrender a right. The deception is no more evident than in the wording of some sections of various enactments created by the de facto Parliament of CANADA, particularly with regard to engaging men and women to volunteer their services to the corporation, which can only be found on the waters described above. The Citizenship Act of CANADA states:  a person is deemed to be born [birthed/berthed] in Canada if the person is born on a Canadian vessel as defined in section 2 of the Canada Shipping Act, 2001.  The Shipping Act defines a “Canadian vessel” as: a vessel that is registered.  Under the same Act, “vessel” means “ship”, again confirming that living men and women are not under the jurisdiction of CANADA.

After the repealing of the British North America Act, 1867 in 1893 via the Statute Law Revision Act, all subsequent enactments have been enacted fraudulently.  Any and all claims by government agents, that men and women are subject to their corporate policies, are null and void.

1. There is not a lawful document in PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA that defines a living man and/or a woman as a person.
2. That CANADA, PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, the COURTS of PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA and CANADA, and all related entities, are relying on fraudulent and/or concealed documents, and pieces of paper, and are fraudulently claiming authority over the men and women who make their home on the land commonly known as Canada and British Columbia.
3. The so-called laws of PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA apply only to ens legis Merchant accounts, and not to men and women and their children, and the PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA conceals this fact; otherwise this information would be part of the curriculum of the public school system, which is operated by its Ministry of Education.

What does it mean for us? As Queen Elizabeth II stated in A Proclamation to Constitution Act 1982: ” Of all which Our loving subjects and all others whom these Presents may concern are- hereby required to take notice and to govern themselfves accordingly.

MC, DB